SCOTUS uses catch-22 to reject illegal wiretapping case

This is the place for secular issues.Discuss society and Politics, social action, the Christian identity and chruch's place in the world. We can also discuss science.

Moderator:Metacrock

Post Reply
User avatar
tinythinker
Posts:1331
Joined:Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:16 pm
SCOTUS uses catch-22 to reject illegal wiretapping case

Post by tinythinker » Tue Feb 19, 2008 2:14 pm

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court rejected a challenge Tuesday to the Bush administration's domestic spying program.

The justices' decision, issued without comment, is the latest setback to legal efforts to force disclosure of details of the warrantless wiretapping that began after the Sept. 11 attacks.

The American Civil Liberties Union wanted the court to allow a lawsuit by the group and individuals over the wiretapping program. The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the suit, saying the plaintiffs could not prove their communications had been monitored.

The government has refused to turn over information about the closely guarded program that could reveal who has been under surveillance.

ACLU legal director Steven R. Shapiro has said his group is in a "Catch-22" because the government says the identities of people whose communications have been intercepted is secret. But only people who know they have been wiretapped can sue over the program, Shapiro has said.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last year ruled against an Islamic charity that also challenged program, concluding that a key piece of evidence is protected as a state secret...

full article
So the US government is now just coming out and candidly admitting that it can do whatever the hell it wants whenever the hell it wants to whoever the hell it wants and then block any legal challenge by claiming it is a "state secret". No attempt to at least preserve the veneer of respecting the idea of "by the people for the people" or following the Bill of Rights.
Adrift in the endless river

User avatar
Metacrock
Posts:10046
Joined:Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:03 am
Location:Dallas
Contact:

Re: SCOTUS uses catch-22 to reject illegal wiretapping case

Post by Metacrock » Tue Feb 19, 2008 10:07 pm

tell us something we don't already know! 8-)
Have Theology, Will argue: wire Metacrock
Buy My book: The Trace of God: Warrant for belief

User avatar
tinythinker
Posts:1331
Joined:Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:16 pm

Re: SCOTUS uses catch-22 to reject illegal wiretapping case

Post by tinythinker » Wed Feb 20, 2008 10:59 am

Metacrock wrote:tell us something we don't already know! 8-)
Pottos in the westermost part of that taxon's range tend to have a small keel on their caninform premolar which might be employed in chewing through the bark of trees to get to the sap.
Adrift in the endless river

User avatar
Metacrock
Posts:10046
Joined:Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:03 am
Location:Dallas
Contact:

Re: SCOTUS uses catch-22 to reject illegal wiretapping case

Post by Metacrock » Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:25 am

tinythinker wrote:
Metacrock wrote:tell us something we don't already know! 8-)
Pottos in the westermost part of that taxon's range tend to have a small keel on their caninform premolar which might be employed in chewing through the bark of trees to get to the sap.

I knew that. doesn't everybody? (asshole) :mrgreen:
Have Theology, Will argue: wire Metacrock
Buy My book: The Trace of God: Warrant for belief

Post Reply