Apophatic vs. Cataphatic theology

Discuss arguments for existence of God and faith in general. Any aspect of any orientation toward religion/spirituality, as long as it is based upon a positive open to other people attitude.

Moderator:Metacrock

User avatar
Magritte
Posts:831
Joined:Sat Dec 29, 2012 10:36 am
Re: Apophatic vs. Cataphatic theology

Post by Magritte » Tue Sep 20, 2016 9:09 am

Are you expressing here what's known as social trinitarianism?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Trinity
One of the hallmarks of freedom is that when you recognize someone is being intellectually dishonest or arguing with you in bad faith, you have the option to walk away without being punished, imprisoned or tortured.

User avatar
Metacrock
Posts:10046
Joined:Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:03 am
Location:Dallas
Contact:

Re: Apophatic vs. Cataphatic theology

Post by Metacrock » Mon Sep 26, 2016 5:53 am

Magritte wrote:Are you expressing here what's known as social trinitarianism?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Trinity
Not if by loving relationship one means to reduce Platonic essence to just that, that would make the unity sort of symbolic. I believe they really share the same essence.
Have Theology, Will argue: wire Metacrock
Buy My book: The Trace of God: Warrant for belief

User avatar
met
Posts:2813
Joined:Mon Jun 16, 2008 1:05 pm

Re: Apophatic vs. Cataphatic theology

Post by met » Tue Sep 27, 2016 9:33 am

... but if you self-describe as panentheistic, doesn't every other being have to share that essence too?
The “One” is the space of the “world” of the tick, but also the “pinch” of the lobster, or that rendezvous in person to confirm online pictures (with a new lover or an old God). This is the machinery operative...as “onto-theology."
Dr Ward Blanton

Post Reply