Really, Metacrock? I am not sure what you hope to gain by these absurd claims, when anyone can look up the thread, and see that what I said was : "I do not think scientism is true using the more usual definitions, as seen on Wiki."Metacrock wrote:no you said it doesn't exist, it exists it's just wrong,
Why Scientism is True!
Moderator:Metacrock
Re: Why Scientism is True!
Jim remembers you saying it, I am not going to waste my time looking for it, you have never responded to my arguments on defginitionThe Pixie wrote:Really, Metacrock? I am not sure what you hope to gain by these absurd claims, when anyone can look up the thread, and see that what I said was : "I do not think scientism is true using the more usual definitions, as seen on Wiki."Metacrock wrote:no you said it doesn't exist, it exists it's just wrong,
Have Theology, Will argue: wire Metacrock
Buy My book: The Trace of God: Warrant for belief
Buy My book: The Trace of God: Warrant for belief
Re: Why Scientism is True!
See this is what I mean about you guys not backing up claims.Metacrock wrote:Jim remembers you saying it, I am not going to waste my time looking for it, you have never responded to my arguments on defginitionThe Pixie wrote:Really, Metacrock? I am not sure what you hope to gain by these absurd claims, when anyone can look up the thread, and see that what I said was : "I do not think scientism is true using the more usual definitions, as seen on Wiki."Metacrock wrote:no you said it doesn't exist, it exists it's just wrong,
Somewhere you have got this confused idea in your head, and you present it as fact, and yet when challenged, you conjure up all sorts of excuses for not backing up.