Hold on. You're trying to make it look like I'm saying that no explosive materials were ever placed directly on any of the columns. That would be false.fleetmouse wrote: We hammered that out in the other thread. I asked if these disguised materials (ceiling tiles and smoke detectors, but feel free to adhoc up something else) were placed directly on the steel and you said no.
That wasn't my point either. It would be possible that witting operatives were working on the demolition in conjunction with those who were working unwittingly.I'm still waiting to hear how your unwitting stooges situated them and wired them for detonation without realizing what was up.
More like, you were trying to steer the conversation to some prefigured 'debunking' point...I was asking a question.
My point was that the percussive effect would be different from what one would expect from conventional explosives. IOW, the Not a Demolition film is comparing apples to oranges.Nano-thermite exists. But I have grave doubts about the existence of nanothermite ceiling tiles that can bring down a building virtually silently
That’s not the same as saying the WTC demolition was virtually silent. In fact there is much evidence that the film distorts that would prove otherwise.